Negotiating Care and Control

A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Benevolent Sexism among Politically Active Women Married to Politically Active Men

Authors

  • Nayana Krishna M

Keywords:

Benevolent Sexism, Women in Politics, Marriage, Reflexive Thematic Analysis, Gender Power

Abstract

Benevolent sexism refers to attitudes and practices that appear caring and protective toward women but simultaneously reinforce traditional gender roles and male dominance. While often less visible than hostile sexism, benevolent sexism plays a powerful role in shaping women’s autonomy, agency, and participation in public life. This qualitative study explores how benevolent sexism is experienced, interpreted, and negotiated by politically active women married to politically active men. In-depth interviews were conducted with five politically active women from Kottayam District, Kerala. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006, 2019) within a constructivist–interpretivist epistemological framework. Four themes were generated: (a) care as a gendered technology of control, (b) internalisation of dependence through gender ideologies, (c) the double burden of political visibility and domestic invisibility, and (d) shaping and silencing of women’s political voice within marriage. The findings demonstrate that benevolent sexism operates relationally at the intersection of intimacy and politics, subtly constraining women’s political autonomy while being normalised as love, safety, and support. The study highlights the need to critically interrogate gendered power within politically progressive spaces.

References

Bowell, T. (n.d.). Feminist standpoint theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. University of Waikato. https://iep.utm.edu/fem-stan/

Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.

Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109

Good, J. J., & Sanchez, D. T. (2009). Communal stereotypes prime men’s benevolent sexism: Implications for romance and family. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10(1), 88–94.

Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.

Hartsock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 283–310). Springer.

Hideg, I., Lam, J., & Wong, H. (2025, September 17). Benevolent sexism and gender equity at work. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-439

Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

Kapur, P., Shashwati, S., & Gupta, P. (2023). Exploring the dynamics of negotiating everyday sexism in India: A daily diary study. The Qualitative Report, 28(4), 1166–1192.

Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12011

Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643–644.

Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269

Sardenberg, C. M. B. (2009). Liberal vs. liberating empowerment: A Latin American feminist perspective. IDS Bulletin, 39(6), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2008.tb00505.x

The Federal. (2023, March 19). ‘Benevolent sexism’ a norm among young women in Kerala, reveals survey. https://thefederal.com/states/south/kerala/benevolent-sexism-a-norm-among-young-women-in-kerala-shows-survey

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

Issue

Section

Research Articles